Separate observed activity, orders attributed under an agreed rule and the additional impact estimated through comparison. They describe different aspects of the commercial result.

Define what each measure means

Influenced revenue associates sales with accounts having interactions included in the measurement rule. It helps describe the journey but does not establish causation.

Attributed orders depend on a convention, such as a purchase within a defined period after contact. State that rule and avoid counting one order multiple times because it followed an email, a portal visit and a call.

Incremental revenue estimates what exceeds the expected result under the usual process. Define the comparison before launching the scenario rather than selecting an attractive baseline afterwards.

Build a comparable holdout

Define eligible accounts and, where feasible, allocate them randomly between the tested journey and normal follow-up. With small groups, examine balance in sector, previous purchases and inactivity.

Choose a period compatible with buying cycles. Define exclusions and outcomes consistently: confirmed orders, paid sales or sustained return. Record parallel sales interventions to understand the results and potential differences between groups.

Work through an illustrative result

The following is entirely fictional and is not a RAKOR customer result. Two comparable groups contain 200 accounts each. Activated accounts generate $24,000 in net sales during the observation period, while the holdout generates $18,000.

With equal group sizes, the observed difference is $6,000, or $30 per eligible account. The relative difference is 33.3%. These are point estimates; they do not alone establish statistical strength or repeatability.

If group sizes differ, compare average net sales per eligible account before extrapolating. Check whether a few unusually large purchases explain most of the difference.

Move from revenue to contribution

Suppose the same fictional project has a 40% contribution margin on additional sales after the variable selling and service costs included in that margin. The $6,000 difference represents $2,400 of estimated contribution.

If additional pilot costs are $1,200, estimated net contribution is $1,200. ROI under this convention is 100%: ($2,400 − $1,200) / $1,200. Pilot costs must include expenses not already deducted in the contribution margin to avoid double counting.

Adapt the calculation to actual returns, cancellations and collection timing. Separate initial project costs from recurring operation when evaluating broader deployment.

Connect measurement with RAKOR’s working views

RAKOR’s command center illustrates Overview, Accounts, Playbooks and Revenue. An account timeline connects data, signal and action; the revenue view supports examination of associated orders. Neither turns a sale after contact into proof of causation.

Keep two readings in the example: $24,000 of activated-group sales and the $6,000 difference against the comparable holdout. Calling all $24,000 “created by RAKOR” would misrepresent the result.

RAKOR explicitly distinguishes influenced revenue from incremental lift. The figures displayed in its public demonstration are illustrative. A real project needs agreed event definitions, data coverage and attribution rules.

Check whether the effect lasts

Observe the next order, contribution, returns and team workload. An offer may bring forward a purchase that would otherwise have happened later. Continued account activity helps distinguish a temporary shift from a more useful relationship.

The pilot should support a decision about which scenario to expand, change or stop. The command-center guide connects that measurement with the daily choice of accounts and actions, while the end-to-end guide explains the underlying buyer journey.

Sources and further reading

Discuss the outcomes to measure in your project

Discuss your accounts, catalog and existing tools through this concrete use case.

Book a demonstration